Comments on: Making Twitter Sticky http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=making-twitter-sticky Voice 2.0, VOIP, Social Media Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:08:35 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: VOIP_Phone_Reviews http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-1323 VOIP_Phone_Reviews Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:26:59 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-1323 I'm so love this blog, already bookmarked it! Thanks. I'm so love this blog, already bookmarked it! Thanks.

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-171 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-171 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-179 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-179 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-326 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-326 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-390 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-390 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-392 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-392 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-431 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-431 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-456 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-456 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-472 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-472 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]> By: khylek http://www.web2voice.net/2008/06/making-twitter-sticky/comment-page-1/#comment-489 khylek Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:43:58 +0000 http://www.web2voice.net/?p=6#comment-489 Antman,<br><br>Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.<br><br>BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz! Antman,

Thanks for the comment. I think that Twitter has a very high probability of being a fad. But, maybe even unintentionally, I think their service (using their easy API to send messages to people and groups) has a lot of power. Plurk is a little better in some areas, but they don't yet have an API. That means no other 3rd party services.

BTW: I dig Cre8Buzz!

]]>